Although it has a smaller screen size, the Asus has the same 1440p resolution as the Dell. We tested the 27 inch LG UltraGear 27GN650-B. The VG259QM has a 1080p monitor, a 280Hzrefresh rate, and is primarily designed for gaming,while the PA278QV has a 1440p resolution, a 75Hz refresh rate, and is meant for creative professionals. For more options, check out our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best 144Hz monitors, and the best 1080p monitors. It has native G-SYNC support, but FreeSync doesn't work on it all, and the screen flashes. On the other hand, the MSI is much brighter, and it has better reflection handling, making it a better choice for a bright room. The Samsung CHG70 is much better than the AOC CQ27G2 for most users. With Windows' ClearType enabled (top photo), the letters look more fleshed out, particularly the diagonal lines on the R and N. The pixels look blurry in the picture due to the monitor's matte anti-reflective coating. It has better ergonomics than the LG and gets brighter to combat glare. However, it rises significantly when playing at 60Hz, making it less suitable for console gaming. Note that our tests don't account for the curvature of the screen. Gaming-wise, the ASUS' refresh rate can be overclocked up to 165Hz to make motion appear smoother and for better responsiveness, but its response times aren't as good, at max refresh rate and especially at 60Hz. For most uses, the Gigabyte G32QC is a bit better than the AOC CQ27G2. ASUS ROG STRIX B550-E (AGESA 1.2.0.3 C) Cooling: id-Cooling Frostflow X 360 + Gelid GC-Extreme: Memory: 64 GB (4x 16) Corsair Dominator Platinum ROG DDR4-3600 @ 16-17-16-34-1 1.375V: Video Card(s) ASUS TUF Gaming OC GeForce RTX 3090 24 GB GDDR6X: Storage: WD Green SN350 480 GB (x 2) Display(s) Samsung The Frame 2022 32-inch The backlight is flicker-free, which can help reduce eye strain. The LG 27GN650-B and the LG 27GN800-B score similarly overall, but they're quite different. Oddly, the refresh rate is capped at 240Hz. AOC CQ27G2 It can't display a downscaled 1440p or 4k signal, and since the Xbox only supports HDR at 4k, this means that this monitor doesn't support HDR at all from the Xbox. There's only a tiny amount of banding in the reds, but it shouldn't be noticeable in regular content. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx is great for office use. It has low input lag, a 144Hz refresh rate, and exceptional response times to deliverfluid and responsive gameplay. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx is an excellent gaming monitor. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM are almost identical, as it's mostly a size difference between them. 11:20 . The Dell Alienware AW2521H looks exactly like the Dell Alienware AW2521HF. The ASUS has a better contrast ratio, higher peak brightness, and wider viewing angles. Other than that, these two monitors are remarkably similar. The ASUS gets brighter, its IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, and it has better motion handling due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. This means that you don't have to change the overdrive setting if your frame rate drops. The Dell Alienware AW2521H has an okay HDR color gamut, but it's not considered a wide color gamut for HDR content. The Gigabyte M27Q is better than the LG 27GN650-B overall. It matches the advertised 1000:1 contrast almost perfectly; however, this can vary between units. The ASUS is an inch bigger than the Acer. The ASUS TUF VG259QM is a good monitor for office use. The Acer also has a wider color gamut in SDR and HDR. The VG249Q1A has a 24" screen with a 1080p resolution, while the VG279AQL1A has a 27" screen with a 1440p resolution. so that you can compare the results easily. It supports HDR10; however, HDR content doesn't look significantly better than in SDR because itlacks a wide color gamut and local dimming. The LG 24GN600-B and LG 27GN600-B are also very similar, but they have a tilt-only stand. The ASUS VG249Q1A's out-of-the-box accuracy is great. SEE PRICE. The posted results are with the Boost mode; with the MBR mode at 20, we measured 5.5ms of input lag. It's best suited for a moderately lit room. The ASUS has a higher refresh rate to provide a smoother gaming experience, a Black Frame Insertion feature, and supports HDR. It should be sharp enough for most people for gaming and media consumption, but it might not be if it's for work, especially content creation. It has a stand with amuch wider swivel range, and it supports HDR. It's good for office use because it has great ergonomics and wide viewing angles, but the 1080p resolution may be too limiting for some. ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM 27 HDR Monitor, 1080P Full HD (1920 simple and easy. It's much better than the Samsung C27RG5. Colors appear washed out when you reach moderate viewing angles, and brightness decreases as well. It also has four USB 3.0 ports, which the VG249Q1A lacks. See our Media Consumption Recommendations, LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (PRE-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (POST-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. It has decent reflection handling and wide viewing angles so you can enjoy a movie with a friend in a room that has a few lights without issue. This is a great monitor for gaming. Though they both have an IPS panel, the ASUS has a much better contrast ratio and black uniformity. The ASUS gets brighter, its IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, and it has better motion handling due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. Great horizontal viewing angle, which is typical of an IPS panel. The ASUShas an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, but the Dell's VA panel offers a much better contrast ratio, and it can also get brighter to fight glare in bright rooms. It has an outstanding SDR color gamut, with great coverage of the Adobe RGB color space, and excellent uniformity with no noticeable color bleed. The Acer Nitro XF243YPbmiiprx is an excellent budget gaming monitor, one of the best that we've tested in its price range. Most colors and shades of gray are only slightly inaccurate and hard to spot. Jun 16, 2022: Restructured article due to reflect user needs; replaced the ASUS VG279QM and the ASUS VG259QM with the ViewSonic XG2431 because it's better; LG 27GN750-B because it's easier to find and it's better, and renamed to 'Higher Refresh Rate Alternative'; added the ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM to Notable Mentions. ASUS VG279Q We measured peak brightness after calibration in the 'Custom Color' Picture Mode with Brightness set to max. The LG 27GN650-B and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080p gaming monitors. Mediocre HDR peak brightness. The ASUS has a higher native refresh rate, and a faster response time, resulting in clearer motion with less blur behind fast-moving objects. On the other hand, the VG27VQ uses a VA panel instead of an IPS panel, so it has a much better contrast ratio, making it better suited for dark rooms. so that you can compare the results easily. It's not very effective at limiting colors to the sRGB color space, but the other picture modes are more over-saturated. Some websites advertise the ASUS TUF VG27AQ with a 155Hz overclock instead of 165Hz. However, the Dell has a higher 360Hz refresh rate, better response time, and slightly lower input lag. Sadly, while it does support HDR, it can't display a wide color gamut and lacks local dimming. Good build quality. They both have similar motion handling but the ViewSonic has a more versatile backlight strobing feature as you can adjust the pulse width and phase to your liking. Unfortunately, it has a mediocre contrast ratio and sub-par black uniformity, which isn't ideal for dark room viewing. However, there are many monitors in the Dell Alienwarelineup with various configurations, some of which you can see in the table below. It has better ergonomics than the LG and gets brighter to combat glare. The LG 27GN650-B is the newer version of the LG 27GL650F-B with identical features. 11:20 . RTINGS Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available. Fast-moving content has only minimal blur trail and the excellent refresh rate ensures smooth motion. Here you can vote for our next review, Create or edit custom monitor ratings, your custom ratings will be present on the table tool, and other pages. It has a relatively small screen, which should be fine if you only work with one or two windows open at a time, but it might not be enough for heavy multitasking. The ASUS supports FreeSync, has much better ergonomics,better contrast and black uniformity,the out-of-box color accuracy is significantly better, and it supports HDR. The TUF Gaming VG27AQ has an excellent native refresh rate and can be easily overclocked to 165Hz. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better for most uses than theMSI Optix G273QF, mainly because it has more features. Gradient handling is great. It displays bright colors well but struggles with dark colors due to its low contrast ratio. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has great SDR peak brightness. It gets bright enough to make some highlights stand out in HDR games, but it may not be enough for a satisfying HDR movie experience. The AOC CQ27G2 and the MSI Optix MAG271CQR are very similar overall. The backlight is entirely flicker-free, which helps minimize image duplication and reduce eye strain. put them under the same test bench, You can find the controls on the screen's right backside. The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are very similar overall. The Dell has a slightly faster response time, it's brighter,and the unit we bought has better accuracy out of the box, but this can vary between units. Doesn't get bright enough for true HDR experience. Note that black uniformity varies between individual units. Some people will notice the inaccuracies in some colors. The Acer has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles. It also has better ergonomics and supports HDR. The ViewSonic is also better for console gaming because it downscales a 4k image, which the ASUS can't do. On the other hand, the Acer has significantly better ergonomics, whereas the ASUS only allows for tilt adjustment. There's a hole in the stand for cable management and there's a quick-release button to remove the stand. Best HDR Gaming Monitors They use different panel technologies, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. It also has great coverage of the Adobe RGB color space often used for professional photo editing. Might not be able to combat intense glare. There aren't any obvious issues with the construction. The Acer also has better reflection handling and better ergonomics. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx is good for media consumption. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is much better than the Acer Nitro RG241Y Pbiipx. The Dell is a 25 inch 1080p monitor with a 360Hz refresh rate, aimed at competitive gamers who want the best possible motion clarity. Jul 27, 2022: Restructured article to reflect the current price of monitors; replaced the ASUS VG259QM with the ViewSonic XG2431 because it's better; removed the Gigabyte M27Q and the Dell S2722QC because they're expensive; replaced the Acer XV340CK with the easier-to-find Dell S3422DWG; added the LG 27GN800-B as the 'Best Console Gaming Monitor'. The Samsung is a better choice for dark rooms and provides a better HDR experience due to its higher peak brightness. On the other hand, the Dell has much better reflection handling and faster response time, resulting in clearer motion. The LG 27GN650-B and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080p gaming monitors. It has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, and its excellent ergonomics include a full 360-degree swivel range, making it greatfor sharing content and playing co-op games. The stand supports the monitor well and prevents most wobble. ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD Lastly, the Acer supports HDR, while the HP doesn't, but it doesn't add much since it can't display a wide color gamut and has low HDR peak brightness. The best overdrive setting is 'Off' because the other options have more overshoot with minimal improvement to the total response time. Buy ASUS TUF Gaming 24.5 1080P HDR Monitor VG258QM - Full HD, 280Hz (Supports 144Hz), 0.5ms, Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, DisplayHDR 400, Rtings measured 35ms at 60Hz, meaning this monitor is unusable at 60Hz, and has over triple what most gaming monitors get (10ms or lower). This is similar to the Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD. The Acer also supports HDR, which the Dell doesn't have, but it doesn't add much because it has a low contrast ratio. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? The CHG70 has better ergonomics, higher peak brighteness, and it supports HDR. 2020. Our unit was manufactured in January 2021; you can see the label here. BFI can be activated through the "Boost" overdrive setting, or by adjusting the MBR setting. The ASUS is also better for office use, as the greater screen real estate is better for multitasking. Here you can vote for our next review, Create or edit custom monitor ratings, your custom ratings will be present on the table tool, and other pages. They both have similar motion handling but the ViewSonic has a more versatile backlight strobing feature as you can adjust the pulse width and phase to your liking. You can download our ICC profile calibration here. put them under the same test bench, The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a great gaming monitor. Best Budget Gaming Monitors Videos for related products. It's also a better choice for viewing HDR content because it has a wider color gamut, higher contrast ratio, and higher peak brightness. It also has FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. It has a significantly higher refresh rate of 280Hz, resulting in smoother motion and better responsiveness. The matte anti-reflective coating does a great job of reducing the intensity of direct reflections but doesn't do as well when it comes to bright ambient lighting. This eliminates image duplication and helps reduce eye strain. Gamma is significantly better, but very dark and very bright scenes appear a bit brighter than they should. The ASUS has an IPS panel that provides wide viewing angles, it has better ergonomics, a quicker response time, a higher max refresh rate, and supports HDR.